首页 新闻 财经 股市 国际 财经 教育 军事 体育 互联网

宏观

旗下栏目: 资本 公司 宏观 产业

中国常驻WTO大使:中国的政策工具箱里有十八般兵器

来源:未知 作者:yezi 人气: 发布时间:2018-05-16
摘要:5月16日,彭博社刊发中国常驻世贸组织代表团大使张向晨专访文章,从中美贸易摩擦等热点话题切入,六问六答,金句频出!商务微新闻第一时间与你分享精彩内容! 中国在WTO就美国“301条款”和“232条款”下的贸易措施提出诉讼。最新进展怎样?解决争议的可能性

  5月16日,彭博社刊发中国常驻世贸组织代表团大使张向晨专访文章,从中美贸易摩擦等热点话题切入,六问六答,金句频出!商务微新闻第一时间与你分享精彩内容!

谈及中美贸易摩擦,张向晨大使为何连用两个反问句?

  谈及中美贸易摩擦,张向晨大使为何连用两个反问句?

  中国在WTO就美国“301条款”和“232条款”下的贸易措施提出诉讼。最新进展怎样?解决争议的可能性如何?

  China has filed complaints about the U.S. trade actions under Section 301 and Section 232 at the WTO. What’s the latest progress? What’s the likelihood of getting a dispute settlement?

  张向晨大使

  上月初,中国分别就美“301条款”和“232条款”措施在WTO争端解决机制下提出诉讼。这两个条款违反哪些规则、中方起诉背景和所持立场,我不一一赘述。

  China submitted complaints to the WTO dispute settlement mechanism on the US Section 301 and Section 232 measures early last month. I would not elaborate on the measures or how they have violated the WTO rules, which I had clearly stated at the WTO general council meeting last week.

  关于“301条款”案,我们的目标是将这只猛兽重新关进世贸规则的笼子里,再也不让它跑出来兴风作浪。关于“232条款”案,我们希望借此恢复所有成员对“国家安全”问题原有的审慎态度。

  Rather, I want to emphasize that our objective for the Section 301 case is to lock this beast back into the cage of the WTO rules, stop it from causing any further harm to any members. By initiating the Section 232 case, we want to restore the self-restraint and caution exercised by Members with regard to the “Security Exceptions” clause.

  中国将按照WTO争端解决程序继续推进这两项诉讼。WTO争端解决机制应当有能力解决这些争议,维护正常的国际经贸秩序,这正是争端解决机制建立的初衷。

  China will proceed with these two cases in accordance with the WTO dispute settlement procedures. I am confident that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism is capable of resolving these disputes and safeguarding the normal order of international trade, which is exactly the intent of establishing the dispute settlement mechanism.

  2

  美国大使丹尼斯·谢伊最近在世贸组织总理事会上说,中国是“破坏全球开放和公平贸易体制”的“单边主义者”。他还称中国是“最具保护主义,重商主义的经济体”,自称是“自由贸易和全球贸易体系的捍卫者”。你的论点是什么?其他成员对此如何看?

  U.S. Ambassador Dennis Shea recently said at a WTO general council meeting that China is the "unilateralist" which "undermines the global system of open and fair trade". He also called China "the most protectionist, mercantilist economy" that claims it is the "defender of free trade and the global trading system." What’s your counter-argument and how do other members view this?

责任编辑:yezi